Summary：China’s Vice‑Premier Calls for Bold Tech Push to Secure Self‑Reliance **Introduction** China’s top

China’s Vice‑Premier Calls for Bold Tech Push to Secure Self‑Reliance

**Introduction**
China’s top economic official urged the nation to accelerate a sweeping technology drive aimed at cementing self‑reliance in critical sectors. Speaking at a high‑level forum in Beijing,‑PremierCallsforBoldTechPushtoSecureSelf‑ the vice‑premier warned that reliance on foreign components poses a strategic risk and called for coordinated action across government, academia, and industry. The remarks come amid intensifying global competition over semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and green energy, positioning the push as both an economic imperative and a national security priority.

**Key Developments**
The vice‑premier outlined three immediate steps: expanding state‑backed funding for basic research, tightening oversight of technology transfer agreements, and launching a national talent‑retention program to keep top scientists domestically. He highlighted recent milestones—such as the mass production of 7‑nanometer chips by a state‑linked fab and the rollout of a homegrown AI framework for smart manufacturing—as proof that China can close the gap with Western leaders. Additionally, a new “dual‑circulation” policy will prioritize domestic demand while maintaining selective openness to foreign investment that aligns with self‑sufficiency goals.

**Industry Analysis**
Analysts note that the push reflects a shift from incremental upgrades to a systemic overhaul of China’s innovation ecosystem. By coupling fiscal incentives with stricter intellectual‑property safeguards, the government seeks to reduce the historic dependence on imported core components, which still account for over 40 % of the country’s semiconductor consumption. However, challenges remain: talent shortages in cutting‑edge fields, the need for world‑class fabrication equipment, and the risk of overcapacity if demand fails to match subsidized output. Experts warn that without a balanced approach—combining protectionism with genuine openness to global collaboration—the initiative could strain trade relations and invite retaliatory measures.

**Future Outlook