Summary：We need to write a professional original news article, 300-500 words, SEO optimized, human-like, no

referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
style="max-width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:0 auto;">

We need to write a professional original news article, 300-500 words, SEO optimized, human-like, no AI style, clear structure, with analysis, unique wording. Title: "Iran Furiously Summons British Envoy Over Disputed IRGC Terror Designation". Summary: given. Structure: Introduction, Key Developments, Industry Analysis, Future Outlook, Conclusion. Must output only the SEO-optimized content (the article). Should include title? Probably yes. Should include summary? Possibly not required but could be included as a meta description? The instruction: "Title: ... Summary: ... Structure: ..." So we need to produce article with those sections. Likely include title at top, then maybe a brief summary (like a lead). Then sections with headings.

We need 300-500 words. Let's aim ~380 words.

SEO optimized: include keywords like "Iran", "British envoy", "IRGC terror designation", "UK sanctions", "Middle East tensions", etc. Use them naturally.

Human-like writing: avoid robotic tone.

Let's craft.

Word count: need to count. We'll aim ~380.

Write:

Title line.

Then maybe a short lead paragraph (summary).

Then headings: Introduction, Key Developments, Industry Analysis, Future Outlook, Conclusion.

Write paragraphs under each.

Let's draft ~380 words.

Count manually approximate.

I'll write then count.

Draft:

Title: Iran Furiously Summons British Envoy Over Disputed IRGC Terror Designation

Iran’s foreign ministry called in the United Kingdom’s ambassador on Tuesday after London labelled the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a security threat under new counter‑terrorism powers. The move follows a reciprocal summoning of Iran’s chargé d’affaires by Britain over alleged Iranian‑backed proxy attacks in the region. The tit‑for‑tact diplomatic exchange underscores rising tensions as both sides wield legal tools to pressure each other.

**Introduction**
The latest flare‑up began when the UK Home Office, using the recently enacted Terrorism Act amendments, added the IRGC and its affiliated Quds Force to its list of proscribed organisations. British officials said the designation targets groups that facilitate terrorism and destabilise neighbouring states. Iran’s response was swift, describing the decision as “baseless and provocative” and summoning the British envoy to protest what it calls an infringement on sovereign rights.

**Key Developments**
- On Monday, Britain summoned Iran’s chargé d’affaires in London, citing evidence of Iranian‑supported militia attacks on commercial vessels in the Gulf of Oman and alleged drone strikes against Israeli interests.
- The following day, Iran’s foreign ministry summoned the UK’s ambassador, demanding an immediate reversal of the IRGC designation and warning of possible retaliatory measures, including the expulsion of British diplomats.
- Both nations have exchanged formal notes, with Tehran accusing London of violating international law and the UK insisting its actions comply with domestic legislation aimed at curbing terror financing.

**Industry Analysis**
Analysts note that the UK’s use of its updated terrorism legislation signals a broader Western strategy to isolate Iran’s security apparatus financially and diplomatically. By targeting the IRGC, Britain aims to curb the group’s ability to fund proxy networks across Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. Conversely, Iran views the