Summary：**DSA Members Demand Campaigns Drop Controversial Platner Consultant After Mamdani Advice****Introdu

referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
style="max-width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:0 auto;">

**DSA Members Demand Campaigns Drop Controversial Platner Consultant After Mamdani Advice**

**Introduction**
A growing coalition of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members has issued a public call for campaigns to sever ties with political consultant Morris Katz and his firm, Fight Agency. The appeal follows revelations that Katz advised former New York City Council candidate Zohran Mamdani on strategy and messaging, a connection that many activists say undermines the organization’s commitment to grassroots, transparent politics.

**Key Developments**
The statement, posted on a DSA‑affiliated forum and signed by over 150 activists, reads: “We, the undersigned, call on DSA candidates and elected officials to no longer contract or work with Morris Katz or Fight Agency, his political consulting firm.” Signatories argue that Katz’s work with Mamdani—particularly his role in shaping the candidate’s outreach to moderate voters—conflicts with DSA’s platform of prioritizing working‑class interests over establishment tactics.

In response, several DSA‑endorsed campaigns have begun reviewing their vendor lists. While no official resignations have been announced, internal communications indicate that at least two local races are considering alternative consultants who specialize in progressive, community‑driven outreach. Katz, for his part, has defended his approach, stating that his firm provides data‑driven insights that help candidates broaden their appeal without compromising core values.

**Industry Analysis**
The controversy highlights a tension within progressive political consulting: the balance between electoral viability and ideological purity. Firms like Fight Agency often employ sophisticated voter‑targeting tools and messaging frameworks traditionally associated with centrist or moderate campaigns. Critics contend that such methods can dilute the transformative messaging that distinguishes DSA‑backed candidates from mainstream Democrats.

Analysts note that the DSA’s push reflects a broader trend among left‑leaning organizations to scrutinize vendor relationships more closely, especially after recent election cycles where consulting fees came under public scrutiny. The move may encourage the emergence of niche consulting firms that explicitly align with socialist principles, offering services such as participatory strategy workshops and transparent budgeting.

**Future